Dec 19th 2003

RIAA

9:04 AM

Well the RIAA had a major legal setback today. This story has hit all the news wires today and declares that they can't have the names of the people they are trying to sue. I feel bad for the people that already settled their lawsuits.

In other music news, I bought a ton of new music yesterday. New albums from Death Cab for Cutie, The Rapture, The Stills, The Shins, IMA Robot, and The Decemberists. I haven't given them all a critical listen yet, but so far I'm impressed. It makes me happy that the new hip music is mid 80's Brit Rock since it's always been one of my favorite genres.

Stay tuned, I will be having my top 5's of the year soon. I know you've all been waiting at the edge of your seats.


Comments(0)

Dec 11th 2003

IP Law

11:02 AM

I'm not usually a fan of the Washington Post, but they ran a story near and dear to my heart; and they agree with me. Here is there story on our broken patent and IP law system.


Comments(0)

Nov 26th 2003

Orrin Hatch

8:53 AM

As if I needed another reason to hate Orrin, he goes and gives me one. Are the citizens of Utah really that dumb? How does any of the legislation he proposes help them? Take a look at this bill. Why should the RIAA and MPAA be exempt from antitrust legislation? Hmmm... maybe because they are both involved in antitrust suits they have a good chance of loosing and they're worried? It must be nice to have a senator in your pocket. Read more about it at The Register.


Comments(0)

Nov 24th 2003

Ben Franklin

12:29 PM

Does this scare the shit out of everyone else, or is it just me? Why isn't this front page news? People should be outraged.

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty or safety...
-Benjamin Franklin


I couldn't agree more with that statement.


Comments(0)

Nov 21st 2003

Dancing a Jig on Jack Valenti's Grave

4:15 PM

Kathrine got mad yesterday when I said I would smile when Jack Valenti died, so I dug up this quote of his.

I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston Strangler is to the woman home alone.
--Jack Valenti


He said this during the Home Recordings of Copyrighted Works: Hearings on H.R. 4783 et al. Before the Subcommittee on Courts of the House Comm. on the Judiciary, 97th Cong. 8 (1982).


Comments(0)

Nov 20th 2003

Stupid Patents

8:52 PM

Just when I make a huge point about copyright and patent law and how fucked up they are. AT&T has to go and prove my point. This patent covers "Mediation of transactions by a communications system." Which if you read the entire patent would cover e-Voting, e-Auctions, e-Gifts, e-Donations, e-Wishlists and e-Referrals. You should not be able to patent something just by putting electronic on the front of it. The interent is not fundamentally different than the telephone or walking in to the store. Guess the patent office is too stupid to realize that. Of course Penny-Arcade has almost as high an opinion of AT&T as I do.


Comments(0)

Copyright

9:42 AM

I'd like to clear up my thoughts on copyright for anyone who's interested. I'm also probably going to touch on patent law a bit as well. Earlier I wasn't saying we should do away with copyright. I was just making the point that Ms. Hamilton seemed to imply that copyright law favors the people and not the wealthy, when in fact the opposite is true. Right now the majority of the copyrights in this country are held by wealthy individuals or corporations, not your average writer or musician.
I can see a need for copyright in certain instances. Books are the biggest need of copyright because they are trivial to copy. It's not easy to copy a movie or a piece of music and maintain quality, but with books it's pretty easy. However, is there any reason why the copyright should be life of the author plus 80 years? According to Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution:

The Congress shall have power . . . to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.


The key word is limited.

... ( more... )


Comments(0)

Nov 19th 2003

Republicans Who Don't Suck

12:47 PM

Just when they started to make you think they were all evil, three republicans do the right thing. I would like to take this oppertunity to thank Tom Davis of Virginia, Christopher Shays of Connecticut and New Hampshire's Charles Bass for not being complete neo-con puppets.

In other news. I'm thinking of tying individual comments to a specific news item on the frontpage. This will be similar to how moveable type opperates. The regular comments page will become sort of a guest book. I don't see it as being very hard to implement, so look for it in the near future.


Comments(0)

Nov 6th 2003

Marci Hamilton

10:57 AM

Funny quote I read today by IP lawyer Marci Hamilton:

In a culture without copyright, only the rich, or the government-sponsored, could be this culture's full-time creators. Poor artists like Loretta Lynn would have to flip burgers long into their music careers - and might even give up on music entirely.


That strikes me as odd. It seems to me the only full time creators in this culture are the rich or the government sponsered. Quick name anyone who produces music, film, literature, TV, etc. full time that is not either doing so using grants from the government or is not excedingly wealthy. Can't do it? Neither can I. I was under the impression that artists, film makers, musicians, and writers struggled in dead in day jobs while trying to become successfull enough, by way of government grants or corporate backing, to do their art full time.


Comments(0)

Oct 27th 2003

Hermann Goering

12:54 PM

I read an interesting quote today, thought everyone should read it:

All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger, it works the same in any country
-Hermann Goering


Comments(0)